National Student Survey 2019


Posted in Global Health | Leave a comment

KGHI Student Ambassador Launch

Last Wednesday saw a two faculty and four student panel faced with this enthralling question to mark the launch of the King’s Global Health Institute. The Institute seeks to bring together academics and students from a range of departments and disciplines who want to contribute to discussions surrounding Global Health.

In the first of many discussions organized and led by the KGHI Student Ambassadors, our diverse panellists – guided by Martin Prince, Professor of Epidemiological Psychiatry at the IoPPN – presented a range of viewpoints based on their individual expertise as well as personal experiences.

Our first panellist to speak, Zsofia, got the ball rolling by expressing her views on Global Health as a cross-cultural practice, stressing how healthcare professionals –policy makers, researchers and treatment providers alike – should be mindful when working in another country’s healthcare system, respecting the existing values it upholds. It was acknowledged by the panel that this does not always happen when more powerful countries intervene in the health matters of others.

Dr. Ed Gómez delved deeper into this point, exploring whether institutions which provide aid to countries in need actually help the issue, or whether they may cause additional problems. Being from the Department of International Development, Dr. Gómez used his background in institutional theory to break down the positives and negatives of such international aid, introducing us to arguments both supporting and opposing Global Health as a form of modern Imperialism.

We then turned to Suveer, a PhD student from a multi-ethnic background, who shared with us his own exposure to aid mechanisms during times he has lived in different countries. He spoke in particular of his work in Kenya, giving us a first-hand perspective on the difficultly of implementing healthcare – predominantly of Western origin – into a country, whilst attempting to remain considerate of the standards of behaviour already in place.

Dr Carlo Caduff continues with this train of thought by pointing out the fundamental differences between medicine and medical practices in varying parts of the world. He used the word ‘asymmetrical’ to describe these differences, an interesting but fitting choice when scrutinizing the intricacies of healthcare provision and implementation. With the rest of the panel in agreement, Dr. Caduff voiced his concern on the asymmetry of ‘Global’ Health leaning in favour of the Global North, and how this issue may prompt many to regard Global Health as a form of Imperialism.

Running with this point, Temitope then emphasised to us why the use of Bilateral Programmes is then so vital in healthcare, particularly when working in a different country with different cultural norms and views on healthcare. As a medical student, as well as KCL President of Students for Global Health, Temitope is no stranger to taking action against inequalities in healthcare, changing the way it is viewed and put into practise; an important step when investigating whether Global Health is Imperialistic or not.


To end the initial discussion, Beauty reflected on her own struggles facing inequalities in healthcare and its reformation; as a health-oriented student, she articulated the benefits she sees in healthcare intervention by more powerful countries. However, as someone with lived experiences of these interventions in less powerful countries, she also indicated that there was room for improvement. She ended by conveying how the balance between control and collaboration must be met in healthcare on a global scale before Global Health can be treated as a passive phenomenon that is free from Imperialism.

The floor was then opened up to questions, which our lovely panel were more than willing to deliberate on further – “Is imperialism too strong a word?” “How do we ensure our perspective on healthcare remains Global?” “How can we implement our knowledge from the UK back in our home countries?”.

Professor Prince ensured everybody had their say, engaging the audience with these questions as well as his own; “Is Global Health a form of Imperialism?”

It is perhaps unsurprising there was no straightforward answer to this question, but it seems the discussion had awakened many to contemplate Global Health in a new light. It is in this new light we walk away, armed with information that makes us better healthcare students, better academics and better future Global Health representatives.

After the event, attendees were invited to attend the launch of Dr. Carlo Caduff’s photography exhibit depicting cancer care in India, as well as encouraged to network with panellists and fellow audience members at our mingling event aimed at fostering interdisciplinary connections.

By Amy Ringrose
KGHI Student Ambassador
BA Global Health and Social Medicine


To keep up with the King’s Global Health Institute, and for links to their seminar series, you can visit their information page at:,

Or follow their social media accounts:
Twitter – @KGHI_Amb
Facebook –
Instagram – @kingsglobalhealthinstitute

Professor Martin Prince, Director of the King’s Global Health Institute and Professor of Epidemiological Psychiatry, IoPPN

Dr Carlo Caduff, senior lecturer, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine
Dr Eduardo J. Gómez, senior lecturer, Department of International Development
Beauty Dhlamini – BSc student, Global Health and Social Medicine
Dr. Suveer Sachdeva – PhD student, Craniofacial Development and Stem Cell Biology
Temitope Fisayo – Medical student and President of Students for Global Health
Zsofia Szlamka – PhD candidate, IoPPN

Special thanks to Saba Hinrichs and Ann Kelly, Deputy Directors of the King’s Global Health Institute and Enitan Ledger, King’s Global Health Institute Manager.

Posted in Global Health | Leave a comment

NEW LOCATION “Kant and climate colonialism” seminar today 2 pm Bush House (NE) 3.22

Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, professor of bioethics at the University of Lübeck, is visiting the department this week.  Today he will be giving a seminar on ‘Kant and climate colonialism’.


Professor Christoph Rehmann-Sutter


Wednesday March 13, 2-3.30.

NEW Location!  Bush House (NE) 3.22 (3rd floor, North East Wing)


Kant’s later work on moral philosophy contains some thoughts about a political union of the nations in a postcolonial situation. These ideas relate to the discussion about global governance of climate change after the Paris accord of 2015: Since power is unevenly distributed, the distribution of claims must be “provisional”, he said. But what about the ethics of climate change? In particular: What are the implications of postcolonialism on the ethics of climate change? Which are the impediments and the pitfalls of social transformation that is necessary to mitigate disastrous climate change?

All are welcome to attend!

Directions to Strand Campus (King’s Building marked as “A” on the map):

Posted in Bioethics, Disaster Ethics, Global Health | Tagged , | Leave a comment

2019 Bioethics & Society alumni series – Featuring Melissa W. Gaule

melissawgauleMelissa W. Gaule, Bioethics & Society alumna (class of 2017), now Director of Ethics and Care Management for Coastal Care Partners in Savannah, Georgia, says about the appeal of the Bioethics & Society Master’s programme for US employers:

“I have been getting some great feedback from having a degree in Bioethics AND SOCIETY. Companies that have recruited me have essentially said that they find my skill set attractive because I have social work-like knowledge/education but have all the essential knowledge of a bioethicist. They clearly view hiring me as ‘two for the price of one’ in a way. I think that really speaks to how unique the KCL programme is and how it has made me different from other candidates”.

Posted in Bioethics, MA in Bioethics & Soicety | Tagged , | 1 Comment

March 12th at 5 pm Seminar with Professor Christoph Rehmann Sutter “Intergenerational relationships: The missing link in the ethics of inheritable genetic modification in humans”

We are delighted to announce a seminar with Professor Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Professor of Theory and Ethics in the Biosciences, University of Luebeck, President of the European Society for Philosophy of Medicine and Healthcare, and visiting Professor in the Department of Global Health & Social Medicine.

When: Tuesday March 12th 17:00-18:30

Where: Bush House North East Wing, room 6.05


In its 2018 report, the Nuffield Council on Bioethics suggests that heritable genome editing could be ethically acceptable in some circumstances to influence the characteristics of future generations. I will discuss this position in the light of the recent revelations about He Jianqui’s illegal experiments with genetically modified babies in Shenzhen/China. In this talk I will critically examine their underlying concept of transgenerationalism and their notions of the germline. My idea is the following: in order to clarify, what kinds of responsibilities or obligations are linking succeeding generations, a phenomenological account on the germline as embo


Prof Christoph Rehmann-Sutter

died intergenerational relationship is necessary. This understanding adds complexity to our thinking about the obligations to future children who would result from treatment by genome editing. As part of their good life, which includes a retrospective view on their previous generations, they also have an interest not to have been treated with genome editing.

All are welcome to attend!

How to find the classroom:



Posted in Bioethics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment